This is possible for some puzzles, but puzzles that have relative clues, like sooner/later, higher/lower, and the like, usually require a second pass. I wanted to be able to go through the clues one time and solve the puzzle. But if you want to know why I didn’t disable events, that’s why.
#LOGIC PUZZLE MAKER UPDATE#
I was going to have it update for placement of X’s as well as asterisks, but the latter took enough of my time that it wasn’t worth it. After about the third clue, it usually isn’t necessary to do this because there’s so much redundancy in where it places X’s. So if you place an X in a row or column that already has an asterisk, you have to re-enter the asterisk to make sure everything’s up to date. It only fills in X’s when you enter an asterisk. You could do less, you just have to fill in a bunch of X’s for the rows and columns that aren’t applicable. Other puzzles have more or less, but this isn’t customizable for them. It is setup to help solve puzzles that have four sets of five objects. But when you see a row or column with only one blank cell, you know what goes there. For instance, when you place an asterisks to indicate that Allan’s color is Brown and you’ve already determined that Allan’s month isn’t March, the spreadsheet will fill in an X to indicate that Brown’s month isn’t March.
This spreadsheet fills in X’s when it can be determined that a relationship doesn’t exist. The above example comes from an puzzle at. The only thing more fun than solving these puzzles is creating a spreadsheet that makes solving them less fun. The puzzle part is that you use the process of elimination to deduce relationships that aren’t explicitly given in the clues. Then you get a series of clues to help you identify matches. These are the kind where you set up a grid, like this It’s been years since I did one of these puzzles, but I think they’re fun. My wife brought home a book of logic problems recently.
0 kommentar(er)
